Summary of Technological Slavery by Kaczynski (8/10)

Feral House published a book written by Ted Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, and believes that there is legitimate thought in the book, but does not condone Kaczynski’s crimes.

Many people, including Bill Joy, Martin Rees, and Richard Posner, have expressed concern about the potential consequences of technological progress.

The development of the techno industrial system cannot be controlled or guided, and its effects cannot be moderated to a significant degree, according to many writers including Karl Marx.

The left, defined as those who prioritize issues such as social justice and animal rights, tends to extinguish revolutionary movements by taking them over and turning them into another leftist faction.

Modern society has a range of physical health issues, including obesity, cancers, and accidental and deliberate deaths, and many people are medicated.

Modern society also has psychological health issues, including depression, anxiety, and loneliness, and people are turning to therapy and medication to cope.

Climate change is a major concern and is projected to cause civilization to collapse in parts of the world without drastic mitigation actions.

Modern technology is unnatural and poses a profound dilemma for humanity, affecting and shaping all aspects of human existence.

Many people have negative feelings about technology and a majority of 69,000 surveyed in North America can be classified as “technological pessimists”.

Technology is creating or enabling a range of threats to human well-being, including environmental degradation, physical and psychological health issues, and social and economic inequality.

The Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, wrote a manifesto called “Industrial Society and its Future” that discusses the dangers of modern technology and the need for a radical movement to challenge it.


Navigate the intricate maze of Artificial Intelligence with “Through a Glass Darkly: Navigating the Future of AI.” This isn’t just another tech book; it’s a curated conversation featuring diverse experts—from innovators to ethicists—each lending unique insights into AI’s impact on our world. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or simply curious, this book offers a balanced, accessible guide to understanding AI’s promises and pitfalls. Step beyond the hype and discover the future that’s unfolding. Order your copy today.


The manifesto raises complex, important issues that should be discussed in a rational and in-depth way, separating the crimes committed by Kaczynski from the ideas he presents in the manifesto.

The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist.
The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.

In modern industrial society only minimal effort is necessary to satisfy one’s physical needs.

Yes, there is an underclass that cannot take the physical necessities for granted, but we are speaking here of mainstream society.) Thus, it is not surprising that modern society is full of surrogate activities.

In this section we have explained how many people in modern society do satisfy their need for the power process to a greater or lesser extent.
But we think that for the majority of people the need for the power process is not fully satisfied.

But it is easy to see that neither of these can be the principal motive of most scientists.

Most scientists work on highly specialized problems that are not the object of any normal curiosity.

The “curiosity” explanation for the scientists’ motive just doesn’t stand up.

We are going to argue that industrial-technological society cannot be reformed in such a way as to prevent it from progressively narrowing the sphere of human freedom.
Freedom is the opportunity to pursue real goals without interference or manipulation from others, especially large organizations.
Freedom means being in control of one’s basic needs (food, clothing, shelter, defense).
The “benefit of humanity” explanation for scientific pursuits is not always accurate or relevant.
Many scientists are motivated by personal fulfillment and seeing their work put to practical use.
Science and technology constitute a powerful mass movement, and many scientists find a sense of power in identification with this movement.
The bourgeois conception of freedom is limited and serves the needs of the social machine more than the individual.
Large organizations and the requirements of industrial-technological society exert pressure on individuals to modify their behavior.
This pressure can lead to an increase in people who cannot or will not adjust to societal requirements.
Small businesses often have limited autonomy due to government regulation and the need to fit into the economic system.
The system’s need for specialized workers (scientists, mathematicians, engineers) puts pressure on children to excel in these fields.
Industrial society is not set up for individuals or small groups to have much autonomy.
Technology continually encroaches on freedom through repeated compromises.
The introduction of motorized transport restricted freedom of movement.
The use of motorized transport is no longer optional and often becomes necessary.
The introduction of new technology can change society in a way that it becomes necessary for people to use it.
Genetic engineering will require regulation, which can interfere with individual freedom.
The human being may become an engineered product rather than a free creation.
Environmental legislation has failed to protect the environment despite initially appearing to do so.
The desire for technological progress and economic growth often overrides concerns about the environment.
The industrial-technological system is not sustainable in the long term.

Society is already using drugs to mask unhappiness caused by societal conditions.
Neurology and genetic engineering may be used to modify the human mind and behavior.
Society views any inconvenient modes of thought or behavior as a “sickness” and seeks to “cure” it through manipulation.
Techniques for manipulating human behavior are not always effective when applied to society as a whole.
The system has not been successful in controlling human behavior, leading to growing numbers of rebels against the system.
Industrial society has caused and continues to cause immense suffering globally, including population imbalances, environmental problems, and psychological suffering.
Technophiles are naive in their understanding of social problems and the unintended consequences of large changes in society.
The system is not sustainable and will eventually collapse.
It is uncertain what will replace the current system, but it is likely that it will involve a return to small-scale, low-tech communities.

Nature serves as a counter-ideal to technology and its expansion of the system.
Nature existed before human society and can coexist with various forms of human society without excessive damage.
The Industrial Revolution greatly damaged nature.
The goal should be to get rid of industrial society, not create a special kind of social system.
Leftists tend to support various social movements, including feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights, animal rights, and political correctness.
Dangerous leftists may be power-hungry or dogmatic, or may be quiet and unobtrusive in promoting collectivist values.
Leftism may be a response to low self-esteem or a deep lack within the individual.
The focus of socialization has shifted from sex to aggression in modern times. This statement suggests that in modern times, the primary focus of socialization and control has shifted from sexual behavior and desires to aggressive behavior and impulses. In other words, rather than focusing on repressing or controlling people’s sexual feelings, as was perhaps more common in the Victorian period, modern society is more concerned with controlling aggression and violent behavior. This shift may be due to changes in societal values, the development of new technologies or social structures, or other factors.

The purpose of the Manifesto was to clearly set forth certain points about modern technology.
The Manifesto’s ideas should not be dismissed as unoriginal, but rather considered on their own merit.

The supreme luxury of the society of technical necessity will be to grant the bonus of useless revolt and of an acquiescent smile.
—Jacques Ellul

The media and university intellectuals often steer people’s rebellious impulses towards specific, stereotyped issues like racism and women’s rights, in order to channel their frustration and prevent violence or disruption to the system. This creates a youth culture in which there is a prescribed way of rebelling that is spread through imitation of peers. The system needs a cooperative and nonviolent population and uses integration propaganda to teach values that emphasize nonaggression and cooperation. Agitation propaganda is used in times of war to gain public approval for military action and to demonize the enemy. The system also uses depoliticization propaganda to discourage people from thinking about larger social issues and to emphasize individual actions rather than systemic change. Finally, it uses the “myth of the blank slate” to promote the idea that individuals are born with no innate characteristics and can be molded into any form, which can be used to justify social engineering.

This passage discusses how technological progress and the changing conditions of modern life are causing traditional human values, such as honor, courage, and friendship, to become obsolete and useless. It also suggests that many people retreat into fantasy worlds or focus on issues like nuclear war or traditional morality as a form of escapism from the anxieties and frustrations of modern life. The author suggests that a successful revolutionary movement would need to offer alternative values that can appeal to rational, self-disciplined people and fill the “spiritual vacuum” created by the lack of positive values in modern society.

The Unabomber believes that technological progress is causing a range of problems in modern society, including environmental damage, overpopulation, resource depletion, and the erosion of traditional values. They argue that these problems cannot be solved through piecemeal reform and require a radical transformation of society, including a change in the values and priorities associated with technology. They also mention psychological issues such as stress, depression, and addiction, as well as social issues such as manipulation through advertising and propaganda, and the dominance of large organizations over individuals. The author suggests that historical precedent does not support the idea that societies can solve deep-seated problems through reform, and calls for a revolution to address these issues.

Kaczynski discusses the various problems that are brought about or exacerbated by technological progress, including war, nuclear weapons, pollution, global warming, depletion of natural resources, overpopulation, genetic deterioration of humans, extinction of species, risk of disaster from biotechnology, replacement of humans by intelligent machines, domination of large organizations and powerlessness of individuals, propaganda, psychoactive medications, stress, depression, mania, anxiety disorders, attention-deficit disorder, addictive disorders, domestic abuse, incompetence, dehumanization of work, loss of privacy, loneliness, loss of spiritual values, loss of meaningful social relationships, loss of natural beauty, propaganda, domination of large organizations, and nuclear weapons. The text argues that these problems cannot be solved through piecemeal reform and that a radical transformation of the entire social fabric is necessary. The text also discusses the possibility of computers surpassing humans in intelligence and the potential dangers and benefits of this development.

Kaczynski believes that it is likely that machines will eventually surpass humans in intelligence, due to the fact that the human brain functions according to physical and chemical laws and can therefore be duplicated and improved upon artificially. However, they do not believe that the risk of a large, global physical disaster occurring within the next few decades is as high as some people believe, though they acknowledge that there are some valid concerns raised by technophiles like Bill Joy and Martin Rees.

Finally, one learns that boredom is a disease of civilization. It seems to me that what boredom mostly is that people have to keep themselves entertained or occupied, because if they aren’t, then certain anxieties, frustrations, discontents, and so forth, start coming to the surface, and it makes them uncomfortable. Boredom is almost nonexistent once you’ve become adapted to life in the woods. If you don’t have any work that needs to be done, you can sit for hours at a time just doing nothing, just listening to the birds or the wind or the silence, watching the shadows move as the sun travels, or simply looking at familiar objects. And you don’t get bored. You’re just at peace.

"A gilded No is more satisfactory than a dry yes" - Gracian