Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced – Meaning

James Baldwin’s profound observation, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced,” captures a quintessential axiom about human existence. It speaks to our inescapable confrontation with reality, beckoning us toward a journey of transformative bravery. This article delves into the symbiotic relationship between facing challenges and instigating change, constructing a philosophical framework for navigating life’s complexities.

Bravery isn’t just the absence of fear; it’s a negotiation with it. The Socratic notion of “knowing thyself” aligns well here, because bravery begins with an honest self-appraisal. This internal audit allows us to understand not just our strengths but also our vulnerabilities. Without acknowledging our fears, we become prisoners of our self-imposed limitations. Bravery, therefore, is the courageous act of acknowledging one’s limitations while striving to transcend them.

Inaction, or the failure to confront reality, has its own price tag, often steeper than the cost of bravery. According to existentialist thought, inaction is a form of ‘bad faith,’ where one denies their own freedom and responsibility, thereby squandering opportunities for meaningful change. The risk of inaction, then, is a life unexamined, a canvas left blank. In the economics of existence, the compound interest of such inaction can bankrupt a soul.

Jean-Paul Sartre posited that we are “condemned to be free,” entrapped in a never-ending cycle of choices. This existential framing offers an imperative: to continuously engage in the act of becoming. The terrain of existence is not static; it’s a shifting landscape that demands adaptability. In facing reality head-on, we exercise our freedom to navigate this ever-changing topography, planting the seeds of change that can one day bloom into transformation.

Rational bravery resides in the domain of probabilistic thinking, a concept borrowed from the philosophical underpinnings of Bayesian theory. According to this framework, life’s uncertainties are not to be avoided but calculated. By assessing the likelihood and impact of different outcomes, we can make informed choices about which battles are worth fighting. This probabilistic calculus equips us with the strategic bravery needed to tackle change-inducing confrontations.

A pragmatic approach to life, then, might resemble a nuanced chess game, where strategy and courage coalesce. In this lived philosophy, every move is a tacit acknowledgment of Baldwin’s dictum: facing reality to foster change. While not every confrontation will lead to transformation, the act of facing is, in itself, an alchemy of the soul. It transmutes fear into wisdom, hesitation into action, and, most importantly, it transfigures the raw material of human experience into a narrative of perpetual becoming.

The Life and Trials of Galileo Galilei: A Testament to Facing Reality

In the 17th century, a turbulent period rife with religious dogma and social conservatism, Galileo Galilei found himself at the crossroads of science and suppression. He was a pioneering astronomer who ardently supported Copernican heliocentrism—the notion that the Earth orbits the Sun, a theory at odds with the Catholic Church’s geocentric model.

Galileo knew the risks associated with challenging the Church, the most formidable institution of his time. His telescope had revealed moons orbiting Jupiter, phases of Venus, and sunspots—all of which supported the heliocentric model. Here, his bravery manifested as intellectual integrity. He chose to face the reality his observations presented, knowing full well that this could invite the wrath of the Church.

Galileo could have recanted his support for heliocentrism to placate the Church and maintain his social standing. However, he understood that inaction or dishonesty would have grave consequences not just for him, but for the collective advance of human understanding. His inaction would have been a surrender to ‘bad faith,’ where he would negate his own freedom and responsibility for seeking the truth.

Choosing to face the uncomfortable reality, Galileo published “Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems” in 1632. The book implicitly argued for heliocentrism, sparking immediate controversy. He was tried by the Roman Catholic Inquisition and found guilty of heresy. Though he was forced to recant under threat and spent the rest of his life under house arrest, his actions set irreversible changes in motion. Later generations would vindicate him, fundamentally transforming our understanding of the cosmos.

Galileo’s life embodies the transformative power of facing reality, despite the imminent risks. His calculated bravery was a seminal force that birthed modern science, shattering the illusions held by the orthodoxy. While he personally bore the costs of his confrontation with the Church, the scientific revolution he contributed to was an indelible change, enriching humanity’s quest for understanding the universe. Galileo chose to face a challenging reality, and in doing so, irrevocably altered the trajectory of human knowledge. His life is a testament to James Baldwin’s principle that “nothing can be changed until it is faced,” serving as a profound historical affirmation of the philosophy of facing reality.

"A gilded No is more satisfactory than a dry yes" - Gracian