Arnold Trehub (What to think about machines that think)

Arnold Trehub argues that machines cannot think because they lack a unique perspective or point of view. He suggests that humans interpret the output of these machines, providing context and meaning to their symbolic structures. Despite this limitation, Trehub acknowledges that machines have significantly aided human thought.

George Church (What to think about machines that think)

George Church explores the idea that humans are already “machines that think,” capable of self-reprogramming and extending abilities through technology. He contrasts the efficiency and capabilities of biological brains (“carbo-brains”) with silicon-based brains (“sili-brains”), suggesting that as technology advances, we may shift from simulating to engineering our biological brains. Church raises ethical questions about the … Read more

Jaan Tallinn (What to think about machines that think)

Jaan Tallinn argues that artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology that requires careful development to mitigate existential risks, similar to how nuclear technology was handled. He points out that AI is even more complex because it’s a “metatechnology” that can develop other technologies, making risk assessment more complicated. Tallinn emphasizes that while there has been … Read more

Sean Carroll (What to think about machines that think)Sean Carroll

Sean Carroll argues that the boundary between natural and artificial intelligence is blurring. He references 18th-century French philosopher Julien de La Mettrie, who asserted that humans are essentially thinking machines. Carroll suggests that modern physics and neuroscience support this view. He notes that artificial intelligence development has been challenging because it requires an integration of … Read more

Marcelo Gleiser (What to think about machines that think)

Marcelo Gleiser argues that humans have already become transhuman, deeply integrated with technology in ways that extend our physical and mental capabilities. He challenges the traditional notion that artificial intelligence will exist separately and potentially in opposition to humans. Instead, Gleiser envisions a future where AI serves as an extension of human intelligence, amplifying our … Read more

Pamela McCorduck (What to think about machines that think)

Pamela McCorduck reflects on the evolving public opinion on AI, acknowledging its significance as a transformative scientific, technological, and social event. She posits that AI could serve as a complementary intelligence to humans, citing the example of chess where human-machine teams outperform either alone. McCorduck mentions the AI100 project at Stanford University, funded for a … Read more

Tomaso Poggio (What to think about machines that think)

Tomaso Poggio advocates for interdisciplinary research in understanding intelligence, integrating cognitive science, neuroscience, and computer science. He argues that the quest to understand and replicate intelligence in machines is not only beneficial but essential for societal advancement. Poggio emphasizes that intelligence is not a singular entity but a set of solutions to various problems, making … Read more

Tomaso Poggio (What to think about machines that think)

Tomaso Poggio advocates for interdisciplinary research in understanding intelligence, integrating cognitive science, neuroscience, and computer science. He argues that the quest to understand and replicate intelligence in machines is not only beneficial but essential for societal advancement. Poggio emphasizes that intelligence is not a singular entity but a set of solutions to various problems, making … Read more