Book Summaries
What is Coherentism?
In epistemology, coherentism is a theory that justification is primarily a matter of coherence among beliefs.
In epistemology, coherentism is a theory that justification is primarily a matter of coherence among beliefs. That is, justification is not founded on bedrock more certain than the beliefs themselves, as foundationalism claims, but rather it depends only on the logical relationships between various beliefs. In this respect, coherentism stands in opposition to foundationalism.
The Coherentist Picture of Knowledge
On the coherentist picture of knowledge, justification ultimately rests on an infinite regress of supporting premises. beliefs can be justified by other beliefs, which are in turn justified by other beliefs, and so on indefinitely. However, this does not mean that coherentism cannot account for certain kinds of basic knowledge. For example, if we have a belief that there is a ball in front of us, and this belief is supported by other beliefs about the ball’s color, size, etc., then we can say that our belief is justified by coherence with other beliefs. In other words, our justification for the ball-in-front-of-us belief doesn’t ultimately rest on any particular belief being more certain than any other. Rather, it rests on the logical relationships between various beliefs.
This way of thinking about justification has some important consequences. First, it means that justification is not something that can be achieved once and for all. We can never know for sure that our system of beliefs is fully coherent; new information can always come along and disrupt the coherence. Second, it means that justification is not a matter of our individual experiences or intuition; rather, it depends on how well our system of beliefs hangs together as a whole.
Coherentism is an interesting philosophy because it takes a very different approach to justifying our beliefs than other philosophies do. Where foundationalism relies on basic truths that we can know for certain, coherentism relies only on logical relations between various beliefs. This has some important implications for how we think about justification and knowledge.
YARPP List
Related posts:
- Law 17: Seize the Historical Moment (The Laws of Human Nature)
- Part 2: Isolate the Victim (The Art of Seduction)
- Chapter 16: The Capitalist Creed (Sapiens)
- On Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra Summary (8.4/10)
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Book Summaries
The Halo Effect Summary (8/10)
*The Halo Effect *by Phil Rosenzweig isn’t about discarding the people who claim to have discovered the secrets of business success, but to make a more subtle point, or rather to ask a more subtle question: why is it so hard to define success? There are many delusions that shape the way we think ab
Book Summaries
Law 1: Master Your Emotional Self (The Laws of Human Nature)
### The Law of Irrationality > “Trust your feelings!”—But feelings are nothing final or original; behind feelings there stand judgments and evaluations which we inherit in the form of . . . inclinations, aversions. . . .
Book Summaries
Mastering the Mind: A Journey Through Self-Discipline, Addiction, and Mindfulness from Ancient Wisdom to Modern Science
The concept of self-discipline resonates with everyone, transcending cultural and personal differences. Its importance is a given, but the ways we approach it have changed over time, molding to the ideologies of different eras. 1.
Book Summaries
Evolution: From Blasphemy to Consensus (Complexity: a Guided Tour)
The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy in an isolated system always increases. This principle resonates with our perception of history and our own experiences. Yet, life stands as a defiant counterexample, exhibiting increasing complexity.