Book Summaries
What is Coherentism?
In epistemology, coherentism is a theory that justification is primarily a matter of coherence among beliefs.
In epistemology, coherentism is a theory that justification is primarily a matter of coherence among beliefs. That is, justification is not founded on bedrock more certain than the beliefs themselves, as foundationalism claims, but rather it depends only on the logical relationships between various beliefs. In this respect, coherentism stands in opposition to foundationalism.
The Coherentist Picture of Knowledge
On the coherentist picture of knowledge, justification ultimately rests on an infinite regress of supporting premises. beliefs can be justified by other beliefs, which are in turn justified by other beliefs, and so on indefinitely. However, this does not mean that coherentism cannot account for certain kinds of basic knowledge. For example, if we have a belief that there is a ball in front of us, and this belief is supported by other beliefs about the ball’s color, size, etc., then we can say that our belief is justified by coherence with other beliefs. In other words, our justification for the ball-in-front-of-us belief doesn’t ultimately rest on any particular belief being more certain than any other. Rather, it rests on the logical relationships between various beliefs.
This way of thinking about justification has some important consequences. First, it means that justification is not something that can be achieved once and for all. We can never know for sure that our system of beliefs is fully coherent; new information can always come along and disrupt the coherence. Second, it means that justification is not a matter of our individual experiences or intuition; rather, it depends on how well our system of beliefs hangs together as a whole.
Coherentism is an interesting philosophy because it takes a very different approach to justifying our beliefs than other philosophies do. Where foundationalism relies on basic truths that we can know for certain, coherentism relies only on logical relations between various beliefs. This has some important implications for how we think about justification and knowledge.
YARPP List
Related posts:
- Law 17: Seize the Historical Moment (The Laws of Human Nature)
- Part 2: Isolate the Victim (The Art of Seduction)
- Chapter 16: The Capitalist Creed (Sapiens)
- On Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra Summary (8.4/10)
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Book Summaries
Part 2: Prove Yourself (The Art of Seduction)
Most people want to be seduced. If they resist you, it is because you have not gone far enough to prove the depth of your feelings, and the honesty of your motives. One well-timed action can dispel their doubts. Don’t worry about looking foolish.
Book Summaries
Disss by Tim Ferris
1. DiSSS: A meta learning process – learning how to learn (meta analysis). DiSSS can be applied to any skill or task. DECONSTRUCTION – What are the LEGO blocks? Breaking something big into a smaller units. Ask a lot of questions.
Book Summaries
The Precipice Summary (7/10)
“Six thousand years.” That’s how long human civilization has existed, according to Toby Ord, a Senior Research Fellow at Oxford University’s Future of Humanity Institute. This is but an instant compared to the 200,000 years of homo [sapiens](https://www.amazon.
Book Summaries
Part 3: Honest Living (Models)
### Demographics Demographics are important. John the 35-year-old Computer Engineer, who doesn’t work out and writes poetry in his spare time, shouldn’t go to loud parties to attract a girl like Jenna, who is in college. But demographics are not fixed.