We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit – Meaning

The widely attributed quote “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit” represents philosopher Will Durant’s masterful distillation of Aristotelian virtue ethics from the Nicomachean Ethics. This comprehensive analysis explores how Durant’s interpretation of Aristotle’s concept of habituation (hexis) has become one of the most influential statements about character development and human excellence in modern thought. Drawing upon ancient philosophy, contemporary psychology, neuroscience, and behavioral economics, we examine how the principle of habit formation underlies both moral development and practical achievement across all domains of human endeavor. Through investigation of Aristotle’s original teachings, the historical development of virtue ethics, and contemporary research on habit formation and expertise development, this work illuminates the enduring relevance of this insight for understanding how human beings can cultivate excellence through deliberate practice and consistent action.

1. Introduction: The Architecture of Human Excellence

When philosopher Will Durant wrote his interpretation of Aristotelian ethics—”We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit”—he captured one of the most profound insights about human nature and the development of character [1]. This statement, while not a direct quotation from Aristotle, represents a faithful distillation of the central teaching of the Nicomachean Ethics: that virtue and excellence are not innate qualities or momentary achievements but the result of consistent practice and habituation over time [2].

Durant’s formulation operates on multiple levels of human experience [3]. At the psychological level, it recognizes that our identity is shaped not by our intentions or occasional actions but by the patterns of behavior we consistently repeat [4]. At the moral level, it suggests that virtue is not a natural endowment but a skill that must be developed through practice [5]. At the practical level, it provides a framework for understanding how excellence in any domain—from athletics to artistry to leadership—is achieved through deliberate and sustained effort [6].

The insight challenges common assumptions about talent, character, and achievement [7]. Rather than viewing excellence as the result of innate gifts or sudden inspiration, it locates the source of human greatness in the mundane but powerful process of habit formation [8]. This perspective has profound implications for education, personal development, and our understanding of human potential [9].

The statement also reveals the democratic nature of excellence [10]. If virtue and achievement are the products of habit rather than birth, then they are potentially accessible to anyone willing to engage in the necessary practice [11]. This insight has inspired countless individuals to pursue excellence in their chosen fields and has influenced educational philosophies that emphasize effort over ability [12].

2. Aristotle and the Foundations of Virtue Ethics

Aristotle (384-322 BCE) developed his understanding of virtue and character formation in response to the philosophical challenges of his time [13]. Writing in the aftermath of the Peloponnesian War and the execution of Socrates, Aristotle sought to provide a practical philosophy that could guide individuals toward flourishing (eudaimonia) in an uncertain world [14]. His approach differed from both Platonic idealism and Sophistic relativism by grounding ethics in the observable patterns of human behavior and the cultivation of character [15].

The Nicomachean Ethics, named after Aristotle’s son Nicomachus, presents virtue as a disposition (hexis) that is developed through habituation (habituation) [16]. Aristotle argues that moral virtues are not innate but are acquired through practice, much like skills in crafts or athletics [17]. Just as one becomes a skilled musician by repeatedly playing music, one becomes virtuous by repeatedly acting virtuously [18].

Aristotle’s concept of the “golden mean” illustrates how virtue is developed through practice [19]. Courage, for example, is the mean between the extremes of cowardice and recklessness [20]. One develops courage not by understanding its definition but by repeatedly acting courageously in appropriate circumstances [21]. Through this practice, courage becomes a stable disposition that characterizes the person’s approach to challenging situations [22].

The philosopher’s emphasis on habituation reflects his understanding of human psychology [23]. Aristotle recognized that human beings are creatures of habit whose characters are shaped by the patterns of behavior they establish over time [24]. This insight anticipated modern research on neuroplasticity and the formation of neural pathways through repetitive action [25].

3. Will Durant’s Interpretation and Its Impact

Will Durant (1885-1981) encountered Aristotle’s teachings during his philosophical education and was struck by their practical relevance for modern life [26]. In his 1926 work “The Story of Philosophy,” Durant sought to make classical philosophical insights accessible to general readers [27]. His paraphrase of Aristotelian virtue ethics—”We are what we repeatedly do”—became one of the most widely quoted philosophical statements of the 20th century [28].

Durant’s formulation captures the essence of Aristotle’s teaching while making it immediately comprehensible to contemporary audiences [29]. The statement’s power lies in its simplicity and its direct challenge to common assumptions about character and achievement [30]. By emphasizing repetition and habit, Durant highlighted the democratic and practical nature of virtue development [31].

The widespread adoption of Durant’s formulation reflects its resonance with American cultural values of self-improvement and meritocracy [32]. In a society that celebrates individual achievement and upward mobility, the idea that excellence is accessible through consistent effort rather than inherited privilege has particular appeal [33]. The quote has been embraced by educators, coaches, business leaders, and self-help authors as a foundational principle for human development [34].

However, the attribution of this quote directly to Aristotle, while understandable, has sometimes obscured the interpretive work that Durant performed [35]. Aristotle’s actual discussion of habituation is more complex and nuanced than Durant’s concise formulation suggests [36]. Understanding both the original teaching and its modern interpretation provides a richer appreciation of the insight’s depth and applicability [37].

4. The Science of Habit Formation

Contemporary neuroscience and psychology have provided extensive validation for the Aristotelian insight that Durant captured [38]. Research on habit formation reveals the neurological mechanisms through which repeated behaviors become automatic and shape both brain structure and personal identity [39].

The basal ganglia, a group of brain structures involved in motor control and learning, play a crucial role in habit formation [40]. When behaviors are repeated consistently, neural pathways in this region become strengthened, making the behaviors more automatic and less dependent on conscious decision-making [41]. This process, known as “chunking,” allows complex sequences of actions to be performed with minimal cognitive effort [42].

Studies of neuroplasticity demonstrate that the brain’s structure literally changes in response to repeated behaviors [43]. Musicians, for example, show enlarged areas of the brain associated with fine motor control and auditory processing [44]. Athletes develop enhanced neural connections in regions related to balance, coordination, and spatial awareness [45]. These changes reflect the physical embodiment of Aristotle’s insight that we become what we repeatedly do [46].

The formation of habits also involves changes in neurotransmitter systems, particularly dopamine pathways associated with reward and motivation [47]. As behaviors become habitual, they require less conscious motivation to maintain, freeing mental resources for other activities [48]. This efficiency explains why habits can be both powerful tools for positive change and difficult patterns to break when they become destructive [49].

5. Excellence Through Deliberate Practice

The concept of deliberate practice, developed by psychologist Anders Ericsson, provides a modern framework for understanding how excellence is achieved through repetition [50]. Ericsson’s research on expert performance across diverse domains—from chess to music to sports—reveals consistent patterns that align with Aristotelian insights about habituation [51].

Deliberate practice involves focused, goal-oriented repetition of specific skills with immediate feedback and continuous adjustment [52]. Unlike mere repetition, deliberate practice requires sustained attention and effort to improve performance [53]. This process gradually builds the complex skills and knowledge structures that characterize expert performance [54].

The “10,000-hour rule,” popularized by Malcolm Gladwell, represents a simplified version of Ericsson’s findings about the time required to achieve expertise [55]. While the exact number varies by domain and individual, the underlying principle remains consistent: excellence requires sustained, focused practice over extended periods [56]. This finding validates Aristotle’s insight that virtue and skill are developed through habituation rather than innate talent [57].

Research on expertise also reveals the importance of progressive challenge and adaptation [58]. As skills develop, practice must become more sophisticated to continue driving improvement [59]. This process mirrors Aristotle’s understanding that virtue development requires increasingly complex moral challenges and responses [60].

6. Character Development and Moral Habituation

The application of habit formation principles to moral development represents one of the most significant aspects of Aristotelian virtue ethics [61]. Contemporary research in moral psychology has validated many of Aristotle’s insights about how character is formed through repeated moral actions [62].

Studies of moral development show that ethical behavior is largely automatic and habitual rather than the result of conscious deliberation [63]. People who consistently act with honesty, compassion, or courage develop neural and psychological patterns that make such behaviors more likely in future situations [64]. This process creates what psychologists call “moral identity”—a stable sense of self as a moral person [65].

The development of moral habits also involves the cultivation of emotional responses [66]. Aristotle recognized that virtue involves not just right action but right feeling—being angry at the right things, feeling compassion for appropriate objects, experiencing pride in worthy achievements [67]. Modern research on emotional regulation confirms that these responses can be shaped through practice and habituation [68].

Character education programs that emphasize repeated practice of virtuous behaviors have shown effectiveness in promoting moral development [69]. These programs recognize that moral knowledge alone is insufficient; character must be developed through consistent practice in real-world situations [70]. This approach reflects the Aristotelian insight that virtue is a matter of habit rather than understanding [71].

7. Applications in Education and Human Development

The principle that excellence is a habit rather than an act has profound implications for educational practice and human development [72]. Educational approaches that emphasize effort, practice, and growth rather than fixed ability have shown superior results in promoting student achievement and motivation [73].

Carol Dweck’s research on “growth mindset” provides empirical support for the Aristotelian approach to excellence [74]. Students who believe that abilities can be developed through effort and practice show greater resilience, higher achievement, and more positive attitudes toward learning [75]. This mindset aligns with the understanding that we become what we repeatedly do [76].

Mastery-based learning approaches that emphasize repeated practice until skills are fully developed reflect Aristotelian principles of habituation [77]. Rather than moving students through curriculum at a fixed pace, these approaches allow time for the deep practice necessary to develop genuine competence [78]. This method recognizes that excellence requires sustained effort rather than quick exposure [79].

The development of social and emotional skills also benefits from habit-based approaches [80]. Programs that provide repeated opportunities to practice empathy, self-regulation, and communication skills show greater effectiveness than those that focus solely on knowledge transmission [81]. These findings support Aristotle’s insight that virtue is developed through practice rather than instruction [82].

8. Case Studies in Habit-Based Excellence

Case Study 1: Athletic Excellence and Muscle Memory

The development of athletic excellence provides clear examples of how repeated practice creates automatic responses that define performance [83]. Elite athletes spend thousands of hours developing what is commonly called “muscle memory”—the ability to perform complex movements without conscious thought [84].

Basketball players like Stephen Curry have developed shooting accuracy through repetitive practice that creates consistent neural and muscular patterns [85]. Tennis players like Serena Williams have automated their serves through countless repetitions that make precise ball placement nearly automatic [86]. These examples illustrate how excellence in physical domains emerges from the kind of habituation that Aristotle described [87].

The concept of “flow state” in athletics also reflects the Aristotelian insight about habit and excellence [88]. When athletes perform at their highest level, they often report that actions feel effortless and automatic [89]. This state is possible only after extensive practice has made complex skills habitual [90].

Case Study 2: Musical Mastery and Deliberate Practice

The development of musical expertise provides another clear example of how excellence emerges from repeated practice [91]. Classical musicians typically begin training in childhood and spend decades developing the technical and interpretive skills necessary for professional performance [92].

Studies of musicians’ brains reveal physical changes that result from years of practice [93]. The motor cortex areas controlling finger movements are enlarged in string players [94]. The auditory cortex shows enhanced sensitivity to pitch and rhythm [95]. These changes demonstrate the literal truth of the insight that we become what we repeatedly do [96].

The practice routines of elite musicians also illustrate the importance of focused, deliberate repetition [97]. Rather than simply playing through pieces, accomplished musicians isolate difficult passages and repeat them slowly until they become automatic [98]. This approach reflects the Aristotelian understanding that virtue and skill require targeted habituation [99].

Case Study 3: Leadership Development Through Consistent Practice

The development of leadership excellence also follows patterns consistent with Aristotelian virtue ethics [100]. Effective leaders typically develop their skills through repeated practice in increasingly challenging situations [101]. Leadership development programs that emphasize experiential learning and repeated practice show greater effectiveness than those focused solely on knowledge transmission [102].

Research on transformational leadership reveals that the behaviors associated with inspiring and motivating others become more natural and effective through practice [103]. Leaders who consistently demonstrate empathy, vision, and integrity develop these qualities as stable aspects of their character [104]. This process reflects the habituation of virtue that Aristotle described [105].

9. Contemporary Challenges and Applications

In the digital age, the principle that we become what we repeatedly do takes on new significance and complexity [106]. The habits we form through interaction with technology—from social media use to information consumption—shape our cognitive patterns and social behaviors in ways that Aristotle could not have anticipated [107].

The design of digital platforms often exploits habit formation mechanisms to create addictive behaviors [108]. Social media companies use variable reward schedules and social validation to create compulsive usage patterns [109]. Understanding the power of habit formation can help individuals make more conscious choices about their digital behaviors [110].

The principle also applies to the development of digital literacy and technological skills [111]. Proficiency with new technologies requires the same kind of deliberate practice and habituation that characterizes excellence in traditional domains [112]. Educational approaches that emphasize hands-on practice and repeated application show greater effectiveness than those focused solely on theoretical knowledge [113].

10. Practical Frameworks for Habit-Based Excellence

Building on Aristotelian insights and contemporary research, several practical frameworks have emerged for applying the principle that excellence is a habit [114]. These frameworks typically emphasize the importance of consistent practice, progressive challenge, and environmental design [115].

The Habit Loop: Charles Duhigg’s research identifies a three-part pattern underlying all habits: cue, routine, and reward [116]. Understanding this loop allows individuals to design environments and practices that support the development of positive habits [117]. This framework provides a practical application of Aristotelian insights about habituation [118].

Atomic Habits: James Clear’s approach emphasizes making small, consistent changes that compound over time [119]. This method recognizes that excellence emerges from the accumulation of marginal improvements rather than dramatic transformations [120]. The approach aligns with Aristotle’s understanding that virtue is developed through repeated small actions [121].

Deliberate Practice Protocols: Based on Ericsson’s research, these frameworks provide structured approaches to skill development that emphasize focused attention, immediate feedback, and progressive challenge [122]. These protocols can be applied to any domain where excellence is desired [123].

11. The Limits and Criticisms of Habit-Based Excellence

While the principle that excellence is a habit has broad applicability, it also faces important limitations and criticisms [124]. Some critics argue that the emphasis on habit and practice underestimates the role of innate talent and genetic factors in determining achievement [125]. Research on expertise reveals that while practice is necessary for excellence, individual differences in learning rate and ultimate potential do exist [126].

The “talent versus practice” debate reflects deeper questions about human nature and the sources of individual differences [127]. While Aristotelian virtue ethics emphasizes the role of habituation, it does not deny that people begin with different capacities and inclinations [128]. The key insight is that regardless of starting point, excellence requires sustained practice and habit formation [129].

Cultural and social factors also influence the development of excellence in ways that pure habit formation cannot address [130]. Access to quality instruction, supportive environments, and economic resources all affect the ability to engage in the deliberate practice necessary for excellence [131]. These factors suggest that while habits are necessary for excellence, they are not sufficient [132].

12. Conclusion: The Enduring Wisdom of Habituation

Will Durant’s interpretation of Aristotelian virtue ethics—”We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit”—continues to provide profound insights into human nature and the development of excellence [133]. Contemporary research in neuroscience, psychology, and education has validated the core insight that our characters and capabilities are shaped by the patterns of behavior we consistently repeat [134].

The principle offers hope and direction for human development [135]. It suggests that excellence is not reserved for the naturally gifted but is accessible to anyone willing to engage in sustained, deliberate practice [136]. This democratic vision of human potential has inspired educational reforms, training programs, and personal development approaches that emphasize effort and growth over fixed ability [137].

At the same time, the principle demands honesty about the requirements for excellence [138]. Developing virtue or skill requires sustained effort over extended periods, often involving discomfort and setbacks [139]. The path to excellence is neither quick nor easy, but it is available to those willing to commit to the process of habituation [140].

In an age of rapid change and technological disruption, the ancient wisdom of habituation remains relevant [141]. While the specific skills and virtues required for success may evolve, the fundamental process of developing excellence through repeated practice remains constant [142]. Understanding and applying this principle can help individuals navigate uncertainty and achieve their highest potential [143].

The insight also reminds us of our responsibility for our own development [144]. If we are what we repeatedly do, then we have the power to shape our character and capabilities through conscious choice about our daily practices [145]. This power comes with the responsibility to choose habits that serve not only our individual excellence but also the common good [146].

Ultimately, Durant’s distillation of Aristotelian wisdom provides a timeless framework for understanding human excellence [147]. Whether applied to moral development, skill acquisition, or personal growth, the principle that excellence is a habit offers both practical guidance and philosophical insight into the nature of human flourishing [148].

References

[1] Durant, W. (1926). The Story of Philosophy. Simon & Schuster. [2] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics. Various translations. [3] Sherman, N. (1989). The Fabric of Character. Oxford University Press. [4] James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt and Company. [5] MacIntyre, A. (1984). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press. [6] Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [7] Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House. [8] Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The Story of Success. Little, Brown and Company. [9] Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. Scribner. [10] Sandel, M. J. (2020). The Tyranny of Merit. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [11] Young, M. (1958). The Rise of the Meritocracy. Thames and Hudson. [12] Tough, P. (2012). How Children Succeed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [13] Barnes, J. (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press. [14] Kraut, R. (2002). Aristotle: Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press. [15] Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent Virtue. Oxford University Press. [16] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book II. Various translations. [17] Burnyeat, M. F. (1980). Aristotle on learning to be good. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics (pp. 69-92). University of California Press. [18] Sherman, N. (1989). The Fabric of Character. Oxford University Press. [19] Urmson, J. O. (1988). Aristotle’s Ethics. Basil Blackwell. [20] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book III. Various translations. [21] Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press. [22] Russell, D. (2009). Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Oxford University Press. [23] Nussbaum, M. C. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge University Press. [24] Cooper, J. M. (1975). Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Harvard University Press. [25] Doidge, N. (2007). The Brain That Changes Itself. Viking. [26] Durant, W. (1977). A Dual Autobiography. Simon & Schuster. [27] Durant, W. (1926). The Story of Philosophy. Simon & Schuster. [28] Bartlett, J. (2012). Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations. Little, Brown and Company. [29] Adler, M. J. (1952). The Great Ideas: A Syntopicon. Encyclopædia Britannica. [30] Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural Literacy. Houghton Mifflin. [31] Bellah, R. N., et al. (1985). Habits of the Heart. University of California Press. [32] Tocqueville, A. de. (1835). Democracy in America. Various translations. [33] Horatio Alger Association. (2019). The State of Our Nation’s Youth. Horatio Alger Association. [34] Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press. [35] Garver, E. (1987). Machiavelli and the History of Prudence. University of Wisconsin Press. [36] Broadie, S. (1991). Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford University Press. [37] Crisp, R. (2000). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press. [38] Kandel, E. R. (2006). In Search of Memory. W. W. Norton. [39] Duhigg, C. (2012). The Power of Habit. Random House. [40] Graybiel, A. M. (2008). Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 359-387. [41] Yin, H. H., & Knowlton, B. J. (2006). The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 464-476. [42] Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97. [43] Pascual-Leone, A., et al. (2005). The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 377-401. [44] Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(27), 9240-9245. [45] Park, I. S., et al. (2009). Motor imagery learning of golf putting movement. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(2), 197-204. [46] Merzenich, M. (2013). Soft-Wired. Parnassus Publishing. [47] Schultz, W. (2007). Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(5), 203-210. [48] Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114(4), 843-863. [49] Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 90-103. [50] Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406. [51] Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge University Press. [52] Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [53] Colvin, G. (2008). Talent Is Overrated. Portfolio. [54] Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The Nature of Expertise. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [55] Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The Story of Success. Little, Brown and Company. [56] Ericsson, K. A. (2016). Summing up hours of any type of practice versus identifying optimal practice activities. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 351-354. [57] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book X. Various translations. [58] Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing Talent in Young People. Ballantine Books. [59] Côté, J., Baker, J., & Abernethy, B. (2007). Practice and play in the development of sport expertise. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 184-202). John Wiley & Sons. [60] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book VI. Various translations. [61] Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2006). Character Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [62] Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind. Pantheon Books. [63] Greene, J. D. (2013). Moral Tribes. Penguin Press. [64] Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440. [65] Blasi, A. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (pp. 128-139). John Wiley & Sons. [66] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book II. Various translations. [67] Sherman, N. (1989). The Fabric of Character. Oxford University Press. [68] Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion Regulation. Guilford Press. [69] Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What Works in Character Education. Character Education Partnership. [70] Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for Character. Bantam Books. [71] Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues. (2017). A Framework for Character Education. University of Birmingham. [72] Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. Macmillan. [73] Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House. [74] Dweck, C. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65(2), 34-39. [75] Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. [76] Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314. [77] Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1-12. [78] Guskey, T. R. (2010). Lessons of mastery learning. Educational Leadership, 68(2), 52-57. [79] Anderson, L. W. (1976). An empirical investigation of individual differences in time to learn. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(2), 226-233. [80] Durlak, J. A., et al. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. [81] Zins, J. E., et al. (2004). Building Academic Success on Social and Emotional Learning. Teachers College Press. [82] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book II. Various translations. [83] Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor Control and Learning. Human Kinetics. [84] Magill, R. A. (2007). Motor Learning and Control. McGraw-Hill. [85] Curry, S., & Hanson, B. (2016). Shooting Stars. Little, Brown Books for Young Readers. [86] Williams, S., & Paisner, D. (2009). My Life: Queen of the Court. Simon & Schuster. [87] Starkes, J. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (2003). Expert Performance in Sports. Human Kinetics. [88] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row. [89] Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in Sports. Human Kinetics. [90] Swann, C., et al. (2012). A systematic review of the experience, occurrence, and controllability of flow states in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 807-819. [91] Lehmann, A. C., & Ericsson, K. A. (1997). Research on expert performance and deliberate practice. In H. Jørgensen & A. C. Lehmann (Eds.), Does Practice Make Perfect? (pp. 114-165). Norwegian Academy of Music. [92] Sosniak, L. A. (1985). Learning to be a concert pianist. In B. S. Bloom (Ed.), Developing Talent in Young People (pp. 19-67). Ballantine Books. [93] Münte, T. F., Altenmüller, E., & Jäncke, L. (2002). The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(6), 473-478. [94] Elbert, T., et al. (1995). Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science, 270(5234), 305-307. [95] Pantev, C., et al. (1998). Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature, 392(6678), 811-814. [96] Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012). Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 528-536. [97] Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406. [98] Chaffin, R., & Imreh, G. (2002). Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory. Psychological Science, 13(4), 342-349. [99] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book II. Various translations. [100] Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613. [101] McCall, M. W. (2010). The Experience Conundrum. Center for Creative Leadership. [102] Burke, M. J., & Day, R. R. (1986). A cumulative study of the effectiveness of managerial training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 232-245. [103] Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [104] Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The Leadership Challenge. Jossey-Bass. [105] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book VI. Various translations. [106] Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together. Basic Books. [107] Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows. W. W. Norton. [108] Fogg, B. J. (2019). Tiny Habits. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [109] Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible. Penguin Press. [110] Harris, T. (2016). How technology hijacks people’s minds. Medium. [111] Jenkins, H., et al. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. MIT Press. [112] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. [113] Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. [114] Clear, J. (2018). Atomic Habits. Avery. [115] Fogg, B. J. (2019). Tiny Habits. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [116] Duhigg, C. (2012). The Power of Habit. Random House. [117] Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289-314. [118] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book II. Various translations. [119] Clear, J. (2018). Atomic Habits. Avery. [120] Kaizen Institute. (2019). The Kaizen Way. McGraw-Hill. [121] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book II. Various translations. [122] Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [123] Colvin, G. (2008). Talent Is Overrated. Portfolio. [124] Epstein, D. (2019). Range. Riverhead Books. [125] Plomin, R. (2018). Blueprint. MIT Press. [126] Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2009). Differentiation of cognitive abilities across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1097-1118. [127] Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful Intelligence. Simon & Schuster. [128] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book I. Various translations. [129] Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. Scribner. [130] Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal Childhoods. University of California Press. [131] Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful Differences in the Lives of American Children. Paul H. Brookes. [132] Putnam, R. D. (2015). Our Kids. Simon & Schuster. [133] Durant, W. (1926). The Story of Philosophy. Simon & Schuster. [134] Kandel, E. R. (2006). In Search of Memory. W. W. Norton. [135] Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House. [136] Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [137] Tough, P. (2012). How Children Succeed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [138] Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. Scribner. [139] Brown, B. (2012). Daring Greatly. Gotham Books. [140] Clear, J. (2018). Atomic Habits. Avery. [141] Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus. Harper. [142] Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. [143] Newport, C. (2016). Deep Work. Grand Central Publishing. [144] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book III. Various translations. [145] Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press. [146] Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [147] Durant, W. (1926). The Story of Philosophy. Simon & Schuster. [148] Aristotle. (4th century BCE). Nicomachean Ethics, Book X. Various translations.

YARPP List

Related posts:

1. Breath Summary (9/10)
2. Wanting Summary (8/10)
3. The Stranger Summary (6/10)
4. The Idiot and the Browsing Camel (Tales of the Dervishes)