Book Summaries
The Unreasonable Power of Checklists
One of the main lessons from *Thinking: Fast and Slow *is that we tend to be more overconfident than we should be. In most cases, we can afford to be this way because the consequences of failing are not too bad. But some professions cannot afford this luxury.
One of the main lessons from *Thinking: Fast and Slow *is that we tend to be more overconfident than we should be. In most cases, we can afford to be this way because the consequences of failing are not too bad. But some professions cannot afford this luxury.
One day over breakfast, a medical resident asked how Dr. Apgar would make a systematic assessment of a newborn. “That’s easy,” she replied. “You would do it like this.” Apgar jotted down five variables (heart rate, respiration, reflex, muscle tone, and color) and three scores (0, 1, or 2, depending on the robustness of each sign). Realizing that she might have made a breakthrough that any delivery room could implement, Apgar began rating infants by this rule one minute after they were born. A baby with a total score of 8 or above was likely to be pink, squirming, crying, grimacing, with a pulse of 100 or more—in good shape. A baby with a score of 4 or below was probably bluish, flaccid, passive, with a slow or weak pulse—in need of immediate intervention. Applying Apgar’s score, the staff in delivery rooms finally had consistent standards for determining which babies were in trouble, and the formula is credited for an important contribution to reducing infant mortality. .Thinking: Fast and Slow, Kahneman
High stakes mean that margin of error is low.
Surgeons and pilots must minimize error because of high stakes. And they love checklists.
If your work doesn’t save lives, it’s okay. You can still improve the quality of what you produce.
There are 2 types of checklists:
DO-CONFIRM— everything is done from memory, then stopped and checklist is checkedREAD-DO— you carry out the tasks as you readThe Checklist Manifesto, Atul Gawande
Before starting checklist:
- Set clear objectives
- Define a pause point to put checklist into action
- Choose type of list – Do-confirm/ Read-do List
- Designate person to put checklist into action
Developing Checklist:
- Keep it short. Less than 10 items
- Focus on Killer Items (critical points)
- Use Simple Language
- 1 Page Only
- No Clutter, distracting colors
- Sans Serif Font
Testing Checklist:
- Get feedback from experience
- Make sure it fits workflow and detects errors at the right time
- Make sure it is not time consuming
- Re-test and fix until it works consistently
- Fix schedule for future fixes
The benefits of using checklists is not only that you reduce error (almost to zero), but that you free up mental space for other more important things. If you had to spend time worrying about what you may have forgotten to do, you’ll forget about the things that you really want to do.
YARPP List
Related posts:
- Will It Fly Summary (7/10)
- Modern Man in Search of a Soul Summary (8/10)
- Part 2: Stir Up The Transgressive and Taboo (The Art of Seduction)
- Chapter 19: And They Lived Happily Every After (Sapiens)
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Book Summaries
Technopoly Summary (Part 1)
Neil Postman’s [Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology](https://amzn.to/3QxneNy) begins with a striking myth about the Egyptian god Theuth, who presents his invention of writing to King Thamus.
Book Summaries
Chris Anderson (What to think about machines that think)
Chris Anderson discusses the unique human superpower of thinking and the potential implications of building machines that possess this superpower to a greater extent. He questions whether, in 1,000 years, Homo [sapiens](https://www.amazon.
Book Summaries
Stupidity
- The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity– Carlo Cipolla –Summary YARPP List ### Related posts: 1. Will It Fly Summary (7/10) 2. Modern Man in Search of a Soul Summary (8/10) 3. Part 2: Stir Up The Transgressive and Taboo (The Art of Seduction) 4.
Book Summaries
The Reasonable Person Adapts Himself to the World…
George Bernard Shaw’s provocative assertion that “The reasonable person adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.