Book Summaries
The Sources of Plato’s Opinions (A History of Western Philosophy)
Plato held the aristocratic opinion that only those who were relieved of having to worry about their daily subsistence were capable of gaining wisdom. Who are they? The wealthy and the political elite.
Plato held the aristocratic opinion that only those who were relieved of having to worry about their daily subsistence were capable of gaining wisdom.
Who are they? The wealthy and the political elite. But what is wisdom? And how can someone gain political power through wisdom? Perhaps some kind of training is necessary, but what kind of training necessarily leads to wisdom?
Russell thus questions Plato’s basic assumption that wisdom is something that can be gained at will, and that it can be easily translated into political power. There are many cases of those who were born poor and later became wealthy, and those who were born wealthy but later became poor in every age, to make us question Plato’s assertion. There is infinitely more wisdom in the human organism than there can possibly be within any individual
YARPP List
Related posts:
- Ancient Philosophy (A History of Western Philosophy)
- Plato’s Theory of Immortality (A History of Western Philosophy)
- Stoicism (A History of Western Philosophy)
- Leibnitz (A History of Western Philosophy)
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Book Summaries
Free Will
- Free Will – Sam Harris –Summary YARPP List ### Related posts: 1. Will It Fly Summary (7/10) 2. Modern Man in Search of a Soul Summary (8/10) 3. Part 2: Stir Up The Transgressive and Taboo (The Art of Seduction) 4.
Book Summaries
Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors – Meaning
The proverb “Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors,” often attributed to African origins though its precise provenance remains uncertain, encapsulates a profound and timeless wisdom about the relationship between challenge and competence.
Book Summaries
The Idiot, the Wise Man and the Jug (Tales of the Dervishes)
AN idiot may be the name given to the ordinary man, who consistently misinterprets what happens to him, what he does, or what is brought about by others. He does this so completely plausibly that—for himself and his peers—large areas of life and thought seem logical and true.
Book Summaries
Samuel Arbesman (What to think about machines that think)
Samuel Arbesman reflects on the potential emergence of machines that can think on par with or surpass human intelligence and how society might respond to this development.