Philosophy
Social Media as Serial Socialization
Think about what Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, and Instagram really are. They aren’t antisocial applications. They are forms of serial socialization. Imagine living on earth around 3000 years ago, you would have known only a few people at a time.
Think about what Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, and Instagram really are. They aren’t antisocial applications. They are forms of serial socialization. Imagine living on earth around 3000 years ago, you would have known only a few people at a time.
You may have been around more people, but they are the same people. Over a lifetime, you may not have seen more than a thousand people. But with the internet, we have all become serial socializers, we know so many more people. But how does this change us? It does two things. The first is that it destroys any illusions of safety. When you are exposed to less information and people, you are more likely to conform to the ideals you have been taught, and this will give you a sense of reassurance.
But if you are exposed to everything, at all times, then this sense of security is destroyed.You will not have a compass you can rely on, you are thrown into the unknown, and you must figure things out for yourself. The journey that results brings me to the second consequence of serial socialization. And that is a more interdependent identity. You no longer see yourself as an individual, or as a part of a group that is opposed to the rest of the world.
You see yourself as part of a global community, and what unites each person is not the accident of their personal identity, but the accident of their personal thoughts. And this is a very interesting development. For the first time in history, people can now form identities based on shared values. This is like a hyper-fast version of an urban city like New York.
Social media has created a disembodied collective consciousness. If you want to think of mankind as a super-organism, and it’s consciousness as a neural net, then social media acts like its pen. It is what writing did for individual societies many centuries ago. But this time, it is for the entire super-organism. It has democratized access to information, to knowledge, and opinion almost completely.
Of course, the picture is not only rosy. There is tremendous empowerment when it comes to social media, but we cannot forget about its flaws. So far we have explored two. One is the destruction of safety, two is the creation of sub-communities based on common thoughts. Three is the creation of echo chambers that fosters the feelings of group safety that was initially lost.
Social media has become a breeding ground for echo chambers. The flip side of being united by ideas is that a collection of ideas is often nothing more than a dogma, and if that is what unites you with other people, there is no guarantee that the character of your conversations are no less dogmatic and intolerant than those of nation states and religious cults.
YARPP List
Related posts:
- The Experiencing Self
- Power vs Meaning: The Trade-off of the 21st century?
- Forever Reading, Never to be Read
- The Stupidity of Proverbs?
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Philosophy
In Defense of Idleness (Week 42 of Wisdom)
> ‘Satan finds some mischief for idle hands to do.’ If you go through the literature on productivity, time-management, or behavioral economics, you will notice a common presupposition: you have imperfections in your brain that will be harmful to your well-being.
Philosophy
The Inverted U
# What is the Inverted U? *The Path of Success Runs Through The Middle* ## The Inverted U In his book, David and Goliath, Malcolm Gladwell explains “The inverted U”.
Philosophy
How to Live According to Your Values
# Evolving Values There is only one authentic way to live, and it’s according to your own values. The more serious considerations are put on hold when you are a child and have not yet developed your superego.
Philosophy
Why Are Post-Modern Thinkers Obscure?
> Truth is ever to be found in simplicity, and not in the multiplicity and confusion of things– Isaac Newton One book that I have read, by Baudrillard, fits this category. The entire book, and his entire line of thought (which include multiple books) can be summarized in a few sentences.