Book Summaries
Prologue (The Rational Optimist)
> Clearly, big brains and language may be necessary for human beings to cope with a life of technological modernity. Clearly, human beings are very good at social learning, indeed compared with even chimpanzees humans are almost obsessively interested in faithful imitation.
Clearly, big brains and language may be necessary for human beings to cope with a life of technological modernity. Clearly, human beings are very good at social learning, indeed compared with even chimpanzees humans are almost obsessively interested in faithful imitation. But big brains and imitation and language are not themselves the explanation of prosperity and progress and poverty. They do not themselves deliver a changing standard of living.Neanderthals had all of these: huge brains, probably complex languages, lots of technology. But they never burst out of their niche. It is my contention that in looking inside our heads, we would be looking in the wrong place to explain this extraordinary capacity for change in the species. It was not something that happened within a brain. It was something that happened between brains. It was a collective phenomenon.To argue that human nature has not changed, but human culture has, does not mean rejecting evolution – quite the reverse. Humanity is experiencing an extraordinary burst of evolutionary change, driven by good old-fashioned Darwinian natural selection. But it is selection among ideas, not among genes. The habitat in which these ideas reside consists of human brains.This notion has been trying to surface in the social sciences for a long time. The French sociologist Gabriel Tarde wrote in 1888: ‘We may call it social evolution when an invention quietly spreads through imitation.’ The Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek wrote in the 1960s that in social evolution the decisive factor is ‘selection by imitation of successful institutions and habits.The evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins in 1976 coined the term ‘meme’ for a unit of cultural imitation. The economist Richard Nelson in the 1980s proposed that whole economies evolve by natural selection.To say that people have cultural evolution is neither very original nor very helpful. Imitation and learning are not themselves enough, however richly and ingeniously they are practiced, to explain why human beings began changing in this unique way. Something else is necessary; something that human beings have and killer whales do not. The answer, I believe, is that at some point in human history, ideas began to meet and mate, to have sex with each other.
YARPP List
Related posts:
- Tulip Mania
- Purple Cow Summary (8/10)
- Will It Fly Summary (7/10)
- Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products Summary (8/10)
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Book Summaries
The Religious Person (Man’s Search for Himself)
> But the attitude of “the divine right to be taken care of” is quite something else. It is one of the greatest blocks to the development of these persons toward maturity in therapy as well as in life in general.
Book Summaries
Rousseau (A History of Western Philosophy)
Rousseau’s first literary success came to him rather late in life. The Academy of Dijon offered a prize for the best essay on the question: Have the arts and sciences conferred benefits on mankind? #### The First Essay Rousseau maintained the negative and won the prize (1750).
Book Summaries
The Top Books about the History of Psychoanalysis
1. The Freud Files: An Inquiry Into the History of Psychoanalysis 2. Psychoanalysis and Religion 3. Young Man Luther: A Study in Psychoanalysis and History 4. Psychology: The Key Concepts 5. The Discovery of the Unconscious 6. Putting Psychology in Its Place: Critical Historical Perspectives 7.
Book Summaries
Part 5: Honest Action (Models)
Men communicate with facts. Women communicate with feelings. When communicating to women, the important thing is intention. Negging is okay, if the intention is light-hearted. Complimenting is okay if it’s genuine.