Philosophy
Doubt the Triumph of the Civilized Individual (Week 18 of Wisdom)
What Jung does when he compares primitive man with civilized man, is he gives a historical perspective of the situation of all of mankind in the current moment. This is opposed to taking a snapshot in time and comparing different groups of people together, such as different races or sexes.
What Jung does when he compares primitive man with civilized man, is he gives a historical perspective of the situation of all of mankind in the current moment. This is opposed to taking a snapshot in time and comparing different groups of people together, such as different races or sexes.
Jung describes to us a much more general struggle that we can all relate to – it is both illuminating and familiar, but impersonal. Yet it is necessary if we want to understand our psyche – it allows us to observe how different economic and technological conditions re-configure our apprehensions, desires, and habits.
The presumption of the civilized individual is that in the world that he has occupied – the social and modern world – he has been freed from primitive superstitions that only disrupt one’s quality of life. The main criticism of religion is this – that it is a hindrance to progress, growth, and happiness.
But Jung challenges this creed on the basis that modernity has, instead of ridding mankind of its irrational fears and superstitious beliefs, has replaced them with new, more powerful ones. If progress has been made, it is an artificial and superficial kind of progress, that only gives us the illusion that we are moving forward, when in truth, the most important requisite for life satisfaction, our mental well-being and self-understanding, have been completely forsaken.
Read The Dichotomy of the Self
YARPP List
Related posts:
- The Politics of Social Media
- The Procrastination Myth
- The Denial of Death (Week 19 of Wisdom)
- The Goals Versus The Process (Week 20 of Wisdom)
Keep Reading
Related Articles
Philosophy
Understanding The Jordan Peterson vs Sam Harris Debates
Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson have engaged in a series of debates that included Bret Weinstein and Douglas Murray as moderators, in addition to two podcasts. [One in which they famously debated the nature of truth for over two hours. ](https://unearnedwisdom.
Philosophy
Revisiting Chomsky’s Propaganda Model
In his landmark essay “[Manufacturing Consent](https://amzn.to/3ZPi8zR),” Noam Chomsky introduced a simple but elegant model for understanding how propaganda and censorship work in mass media.
Philosophy
The Taboo of Uncertainty (Week 38 of Wisdom)
Thomas Hobbes, author of the notorious *Leviathan*, had a strange definition for “free will” He presumed that anything, whether animate or inanimate, is considered free if nothing stands in its way. If there are no obstacles, then there is freedom.
Philosophy
The Nature of Technological Constraints
If our time is a commodity that we exchange for biochemical impulses that we have as much chance resisting as a drug addict his cocaine, or an alcoholic his whiskey, then we need to think again about the real constraints that being imposed on us by technology.